thanks, the OP is of lesser quality compared to this one.
amatecha 7 hours ago [-]
Yeah, I took a quick listen to OP -- unfortunately their mp3s are of very poor quality. I heard numerous glitches while listening :(
muricula 6 hours ago [-]
I think the audio quality gives this recording character. What could be more cyberpunk than hearing the quirky artifacts resulting from ripping an obsolete recording medium?
kevin_thibedeau 3 hours ago [-]
A little embarrassing when the 1970s technology is better than the 1990s.
jszymborski 4 hours ago [-]
I was about to say, feels more of its time...
IlikeKitties 3 hours ago [-]
There was a wetransfer link but that expired. Has anyone got a torrent for the CD Version? Or perhaps a reddit acount to contact that OP to get another download for it? If you can make it available i can seed it indefinetly
acuozzo 2 hours ago [-]
I have the CD version, but I stupidly re-encoded it to something like 256kbps CBR MP3 back in 2012. Still, the fidelity is far greater than what was shared here.
Please share this far & wide. I have a busy night ahead of me or I'd take the time to upload it to IA.
mapontosevenths 2 hours ago [-]
The CD set is ISBN 1-57042-156-0. There are two available on ebay, one at ~$2,500 USD and the other (in worse shape) for $450.
I think the mp3 might have to do for now. :) Thanks for sharing.
acuozzo 32 minutes ago [-]
You're very welcome! Please pass it along.
pdntspa 2 hours ago [-]
256kbit CBR MP3 is pretty good for spoken word material
acuozzo 33 minutes ago [-]
Agreed. With that being said, I meant that it was a stupid move from an archival POV.
viccis 8 hours ago [-]
I listened to Neuromancer on a long drive one time, and I will say that it's a wonderful book but not one that's particularly suited to the audiobook medium. It's hard to follow at times because it avoids a lot of big picture narrative and instead focuses on very small scale scenes of events happening within a broader story. It means that it can be confusing at times, as you are often as in the dark as the characters are.
This is an abridged version, so maybe it streamlines some aspects of the narrative, so take that into account.
sien 6 hours ago [-]
There is a BBC Audio drama of Neuromancer that is 1:56 long.
I haven't listened to the audio book of Neuromancer but I re-read it a few weeks back. The audio play I still go back to once in a while as well.
LiquidSky 4 hours ago [-]
Two minutes hardly seems enough time to do the story justice.
throwawayben 15 minutes ago [-]
it's 2 hours
guerrilla 7 hours ago [-]
I also listened to it as an audiobook and while I very much got the vibe, I have no idea what was going on, which is kinda rare (I listen to a lot of audiobooks). It's as if I didn't even read it... buy kinda did. I duno.
reportingsjr 6 hours ago [-]
I had the same experience reading neuromancer in the last year. I felt like I got the vibe of what was going on, but struggled to understand the details and figure out what was actually happening in the story.
shmerl 5 hours ago [-]
I think ambiguity is somewhat intended. It also is continued in the rest of the trilogy. Some things are clearly left for the reader to guess or to interpret. It does make it a not very easy read.
GuinansEyebrows 7 hours ago [-]
i've read neuromancer at least five times and i still feel like i never actually read it. it's a weirdly-written book with little environmental exposition - but i still love it.
prettyblocks 5 hours ago [-]
Came to say exactly this. It's my favorite, but I still feel like I haven't read it after like 5 reads.
mindcrime 4 hours ago [-]
Same. I've probably read it 7 times now, counting a recent listen to the audiobook version on Youtube mentioned above. And I could still read it again tomorrow and I think I'd feel like it was a brand new story.
And truth be told, I probably will read it again, although it might not be tomorrow. :-)
kogus 1 hours ago [-]
I had to read Neuromancer twice; once to learn the world, then once to actually enjoy the story.
kovac 4 hours ago [-]
I thought it was just me. I gave up on reading the book midway,because I was confused most of the time, and found it hard to engage.
whartung 8 hours ago [-]
I’ve tried to listen to a book on tape on a long drive twice. And each time I was lucky to not drive into an abutment. For whatever reason, the droning just knocks me unconscious.
Talk radio is ok, sports radio. I’ve listened to more radio plays with multiple speakers. Those are ok.
Wow, that is absolutely phenomenal! This alone makes me want to listen to the audio book, which would be my first. Perhaps a dumb question, but are ambient tracks and/or similar fx stuff common in audio books? I'd always assumed it was simply a reading.
- This abridged audio reading seems to have been published in 1994
- This article was published in 2004
_spduchamp 2 hours ago [-]
Oh, I have those cassettes and listened to them on a 6 hour drive a couple weeks ago.
Hearing it from start to finish, all in one go was very emmersive. I just needed a little bit of nicotine gum to stay awake through Gibson's drawling voice and U2's dub accompaniment.
The return trip was Einstein's Dreams on cassette read by Michael York. That voice is a treat.for the ears.
themadturk 8 hours ago [-]
So glad I'm not the only one who feels that way about The Difference Engine. (And I don't generally dislike Sterling...this book just didn't work for me.)
anigbrowl 6 hours ago [-]
Same. I love Gibson's writing, I love Sterling's, but TDE remains on my bottom 5 books I've ever read. To this day if someone mentions steampunk I flee for the exits. I feel bad about this because I bought it in hardback on the book promo tour and Bruce Sterling signed it for me, we even had a chat because the bookstore wasn't busy and I told him how much I was looking forward to reading it. In my guilty subconscious he is still at the same store, waiting for a customer who promised to come back and never did. I'm sorry Bruce.
sevensor 5 hours ago [-]
Agreed, and it’s all the more surprising because one of my favorite short stories is a collaboration between the two of them: “Red Star, Winter Orbit.” The Difference Engine just doesn’t work for me though.
khedoros1 7 hours ago [-]
I remember starting that book, but not getting far into it. It didn't click for me, either. That was a number of years ago though. Maybe I owe it a retry.
themadturk 7 hours ago [-]
I've actually read it twice, didn't actually hate it...but I also don't remember anything about it, which is patently untrue about other Gibson books.
I may owe it a third try as well.
speakspokespok 2 hours ago [-]
A number of years ago driving late one evening an interview of his came on the radio. It might have originally been WGBH or a Canadian affiliate I can't recall, but just listening to him talk and expound on his views of the world gave the same thrill as reading Neuromancer and that same thrill of exploring the world through a phone line.
exitb 1 hours ago [-]
I can recommend „No Maps for These Territories” (found bootleg on YouTube) for that kind of thing.
It's been cancelled. Forever. It wasn't bad but it was deviating significantly from the book in good and less good ways. Some of the new stuff was interesting. I'm not sure where they were going with the story. It's probably a good thing that they stopped it.
shmerl 3 hours ago [-]
Apparently the show for Neuromancer itself is now in production.
roughly 7 hours ago [-]
This is probably something worth submitting to the Internet Archive if you’re worried about it disappearing!
neilv 5 hours ago [-]
That reminds me. I probably have a rough video of part of an author talk by Richard Dawkins... speaking from a church pulpit.
It was an old church, with acoustics that worked pre-electronics. At the start of the talk, Dawkins remarked, something like, being up there, he now understands why some preachers speak the way they do.
The book store would borrow the church as a venue for author talks, and it was only a funny coincidence that Dawkins's book that time was, IIRC, "The God Delusion".
(I'll have to see whether I still have it on an old computer, then contact the hosting venue, to see whether this can be preserved in a respectful way, on archive.org. Or they might already/still have a better recording.)
amatecha 7 hours ago [-]
Years ago I was blown away to learn about this "Gibson reads Neuromancer" audio book only when I heard it sampled in a song[0] by Haujobb (the band, not the demoscene group). I recognized the words as being from Neuromancer, one of my top favorite books, but I wasn't aware of where it was from. Had to do some searching online to discover the audio was sampled from Gibson's reading of his own book. Very cool surprise! (as an aside, if you like cyberpunk-esque music, can absolutely recommend this band - check out "Solutions for a Small Planet")
Nice to see direct links to MP3 files. More websites should follow that example.
tensorlibb 6 hours ago [-]
I love how W.G. still reads well to this day. Have so many good memories as an early teen ripping through his work as fast as I could. Enjoyed every single page.
babblingfish 8 hours ago [-]
I didn't realize the Mountain View Library still has books on cassette tapes. Neat!
stevenwoo 7 hours ago [-]
It’s mostly older stuff the Santa Clara county library has acquired over the years, along with books on CD. A lot of stuff is now on Libby/Hoopla and they even have MP3 players with just one book on them you can rent.
hamonrye34 6 hours ago [-]
Planting Accelerando's.
Ayn Rand Institute will shelf Atlas en-mass to public libaries.
jdkee 5 hours ago [-]
I am currently teaching Neuromancer as the primary text for a first-year studies course on cyberspace. It is absolutely incredible re-reading that text and marveling at Gibson's vision of the future (which with science fiction is really a commentary on the now).
gabriel666smith 3 hours ago [-]
A real classic. As an author who was asked by my publisher to perform my own audiobook:
1. There is a reason 'reader of audiobooks' is a profession - it is stupid difficult. I will never do it again.
2. I loved this tape so much. It does such interesting things with its soundscape (from memory - if it actually is just Gibson reading it, then he must have embedded those memories through the sheer brilliance of his performance.
3. My fiancee is partially-sighted (I see her as an investment that will appreciate as biohacking becomes more and more prevalent) and she reads mostly by audiobook.
It's not really how I prefer to read - I get distracted too easily - but I've been appalled at the production quality of what I've overheard. While Gibson's work is a special case, an audiobook is only one dimension away from a film adaptation.
4. Literally all my millennial-Gen-Z-cusp friends who are non-readers opted for the audiobook of my book, not the book-book. Anecdata, but interesting. They would just switch Rogan or whatever out during their commute until they felt they'd listened to (what I assume as) enough of it to be socially acceptable.
5. I have no market knowledge other than that I signed my audiobook rights away to my publishers in the industry-standard way.
6. I'm sure it'd be very easy to procure data that made a case for audio fiction that was well-produced and incorporated soundscape-like elements, being incredibly commercially successful. It strikes me as a form that is ripe for innovation. And everyone loves books on tape.
7. There has been so much really interesting innovation in 'aural mood amendment' over the last decade or two. Some of it seems like pseudoscience, some of it seems legit - I wish I had sources to share. Apologies that I don't.
8. I assume someone has already built this concept - well-produced, soundscape-driven longform audio fiction - I'm not a consumer of that market well enough to know it. It'd be a really, really fun project. I'm sure it'd be very tough to get profitable, but it's almost too fun to care. This could be another reason it doesn't exist.
9. Gibson's 2003(?) novel Pattern Recognition is insanely underrated - probably not by people here - but I think the prose is better, and in a decade or two it will feel just as (if not more) prescient. It's a really, really good example of a literary classic that didn't get attention from book dweebs because it's from a 'genre' guy. If you like Neuromancer, and want to think about the next couple of decades in a similar way, you will really love it. I always thought it'd make a great double-bill with the movie Children of Men .
throwawayben 6 minutes ago [-]
the best author-read audiobook I've listened to recently has been Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky[0].
He did a really good job and I would never have guessed it was the author himself. As you say, it's a very different and difficult job.
*EDIT:* There's also the CD version somewhere out there. Here's a Reddit post where someone ripped it (but didn't make it available): https://www.reddit.com/r/Neuromancer/comments/1gr7k4n/audiob...
I can uploaded it somewhere if you'd like.
Edit: Here you go: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MvEQd-V3Ma86XMnQYpCa...
Please share this far & wide. I have a busy night ahead of me or I'd take the time to upload it to IA.
I think the mp3 might have to do for now. :) Thanks for sharing.
This is an abridged version, so maybe it streamlines some aspects of the narrative, so take that into account.
It is excellent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S89BHnaxULo
I haven't listened to the audio book of Neuromancer but I re-read it a few weeks back. The audio play I still go back to once in a while as well.
And truth be told, I probably will read it again, although it might not be tomorrow. :-)
Talk radio is ok, sports radio. I’ve listened to more radio plays with multiple speakers. Those are ok.
But books on tape, nope. Too dangerous for me.
William Gibson reads Neuromancer, from tape to mp3 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14021369 - April 2017 (3 comments)
Re. the date:
- The original book was published in 1984
- This abridged audio reading seems to have been published in 1994
- This article was published in 2004
Hearing it from start to finish, all in one go was very emmersive. I just needed a little bit of nicotine gum to stay awake through Gibson's drawling voice and U2's dub accompaniment.
The return trip was Einstein's Dreams on cassette read by Michael York. That voice is a treat.for the ears.
I may owe it a third try as well.
Hopefully they renew it eventually
It was an old church, with acoustics that worked pre-electronics. At the start of the talk, Dawkins remarked, something like, being up there, he now understands why some preachers speak the way they do.
The book store would borrow the church as a venue for author talks, and it was only a funny coincidence that Dawkins's book that time was, IIRC, "The God Delusion".
(I'll have to see whether I still have it on an old computer, then contact the hosting venue, to see whether this can be preserved in a respectful way, on archive.org. Or they might already/still have a better recording.)
[0] https://haujobb.bandcamp.com/track/penetration-fuck-the-floo... at 2m45s
Ayn Rand Institute will shelf Atlas en-mass to public libaries.
1. There is a reason 'reader of audiobooks' is a profession - it is stupid difficult. I will never do it again.
2. I loved this tape so much. It does such interesting things with its soundscape (from memory - if it actually is just Gibson reading it, then he must have embedded those memories through the sheer brilliance of his performance.
3. My fiancee is partially-sighted (I see her as an investment that will appreciate as biohacking becomes more and more prevalent) and she reads mostly by audiobook.
It's not really how I prefer to read - I get distracted too easily - but I've been appalled at the production quality of what I've overheard. While Gibson's work is a special case, an audiobook is only one dimension away from a film adaptation.
4. Literally all my millennial-Gen-Z-cusp friends who are non-readers opted for the audiobook of my book, not the book-book. Anecdata, but interesting. They would just switch Rogan or whatever out during their commute until they felt they'd listened to (what I assume as) enough of it to be socially acceptable.
5. I have no market knowledge other than that I signed my audiobook rights away to my publishers in the industry-standard way.
6. I'm sure it'd be very easy to procure data that made a case for audio fiction that was well-produced and incorporated soundscape-like elements, being incredibly commercially successful. It strikes me as a form that is ripe for innovation. And everyone loves books on tape.
7. There has been so much really interesting innovation in 'aural mood amendment' over the last decade or two. Some of it seems like pseudoscience, some of it seems legit - I wish I had sources to share. Apologies that I don't.
8. I assume someone has already built this concept - well-produced, soundscape-driven longform audio fiction - I'm not a consumer of that market well enough to know it. It'd be a really, really fun project. I'm sure it'd be very tough to get profitable, but it's almost too fun to care. This could be another reason it doesn't exist.
9. Gibson's 2003(?) novel Pattern Recognition is insanely underrated - probably not by people here - but I think the prose is better, and in a decade or two it will feel just as (if not more) prescient. It's a really, really good example of a literary classic that didn't get attention from book dweebs because it's from a 'genre' guy. If you like Neuromancer, and want to think about the next couple of decades in a similar way, you will really love it. I always thought it'd make a great double-bill with the movie Children of Men .
[0] https://www.audible.co.uk/pd/B0CMXTZZN2